Tick-borne disease: ehrlichia-lyme borreliosis-anaplasmosis (Proceedings)
In just the past 3 to 5 years, advanced diagnostic capabilities have enhanced our ability to detect infectious pathogens in the dog and have given credence to the term "emerging" infections. However, the ever-expanding list of "emerging infectious diseases", in fact, may not be emerging at all…as it appears; many of these infections have, quite likely, existed in dogs for several years. It's the emerging technology that has enabled our ability to detect these infections.
AND…it's MUCH more than Blue Dots! As we move from the 3Dx test to the 4Dx testing platform, veterinarians now have the ability to test for Anaplasma phagocytophilum antibody, in addition to Borrelia burgdorferi C6 antibody, Ehrlichia canis antibody, and canine heartworm antigen. Specifically, the introduction of the 4Dx SANP Test emphasizes the importance of understanding not only the indications for performing the test, but, most importantly, the implications of a POSITIVE vs. NEGATIVE test result in the sick, versus healthy, patient.
Canine ehrlichiosisWhat is the spectrum of clinical signs associated with ehrlichiosis?
The standard answer goes like this:Incubation is 8 to 20 days.
• ACUTE (2-4 weeks): signs may be mild to absent (at least to the owner) or may include lethargy, anorexia and possibly epistaxis. IF…the owner seeks medical attention, fever may be detected evidence of spontaneous bleeding. A laboratory profile may reveal thrombocytopenia, low albumin with elevated globulin (total protein may be elevated). THEN…they get better…whether or not they receive treatment.
The variation in physical signs and laboratory values is significant. For example…the absence of thrombocytopenia does NOT exclude a diagnosis of ehrlichiosis. As such, it is not feasible to rely exclusively on clinical or laboratory findings to establish a diagnosis. Testing is important. The message here is not to limit testing to only those patients that have obvious physical signs that are distinctively associated with ehrlichiosis…"test outside the box"!
Is co-infection with other tick-borne agents significant with ehrlichiosis?
With increasing significance…YES. The more we look, the more we discover oc-infected dogs…and this is true in humans who are infected with tick-borne disease. AND…it's the co-infected patient that makes it difficult to establish a diagnosis on the basis of clinical signs.
What's still needed in veterinary medicine is a testing platform that will allow screening of individual patients for multiple tick-borne pathogens, simultaneously! And work is currently underway to achieve that.